The verdict of this trial is a foregone conclusion, and the explanation is simple and easy to understand. The best way to explain is to compare the similarities and differences to the OJ Simpson trial.
SIMILARITIES:
Both trials had a biased jury that was so skewed in favor of the defendant that he would be acquitted even if these scenarios were met:
a. The defendant stood up and said to the jury that he was guilty and would gladly do the same again.
b. God revealed the defendant was guilty of the crime.
DIFFERENCES:
a. The OJ jurors had lived in poverty, crime-ridden ghettos, and prejudice so long that this was a chance of payback to the man.
b. The GOP members who voted to acquit are simply cowards who did not have the integrity to vote guilty in hopes that they could survive the next election.
